Abstract Background The outcome of breast cancer treatment largely depends on the timing of detection. The health promotion interventions have an immense contribution to early detection and improved survival. Therefore, this review aimed colorectal cancer global statistics provide evidence on the efficacy of the health promotion interventions to increase the uptake of breast cancer screening and to develop effective interventions targeting women.
Understanding Colorectal Cancer
The score was rated for the included articles by each researcher independently and the average score is given accordingly. Results The review dovetailed 22 studies. Thirteen studies Conclusion The review confirmed that most of the health promotion interventions targeting women boosted the breast screening in one or another way.
Death rates from pancreatic cancer predicted to rise in Europe in 2014
However, the limited quality of the included colorectal cancer global statistics showed that further colorectal cancer global statistics is needed to improve the trials in the next future. Introduction Colorectal cancer global statistics global burden of breast cancer in women is enormous in the developed and the developing world.
It is estimated that over women were died in globally due to breast cancer. Its incidence is increasing in the developing world due to increased life expectancy, urbanization and adoption of western lifestyles. The death toll for that same year was estimated at 39 deaths. Studies published as of January — were searched.
Reference lists of included studies were also scanned to identify additional relevant papers. All articles were published in English language. Finally, a total of 22 colorectal cancer global statistics were identified.
We limited our review to start from since the previous review was included the articles up to in one or another way. Exclusion criteria i focused on survivors of breast cancer biomedical treatment and rehabilitation.
Romanian Statistical Review
All age groups were included in this study review since the recommendation of cancer screening test varies in developing countries to developed countries; even there is even no guideline in some countries. Two investigators then independently reviewed all located articles to confirm colorectal cancer global statistics inclusion criteria were met. The rest investigators also reviewed to check its consistency.
In cases of doubt based on abstracts, the articles were included for full-text articles review. The authors independently reviewed all full-text articles to confirm whether inclusion criteria were met or not. The data were synthesized in two ways: first, the study design and intervention strategies were presented for all 22 studies that met inclusion criteria. Second, the findings of each study were analyzed. Study designs were classified into randomized controlled trials RCTs; including cluster RCT and randomized controlled crossover trialquasi-experimental study or non-equivalent control colorectal cancer global statistics.
In order to present reliable evidence on intervention effectiveness, quality assessments were conducted following the criteria Data Collection Checklist from the Cochrane EPOC guidelines.